|
Persistent Identifier
|
perma:LIST.QZNYOD |
|
Publication Date
|
2025-09-26 |
|
Title
| Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review [* Cross-Reference *] |
|
Other Identifier
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113198 |
|
Author
| Berger, Katja (Universitat de València, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Machwitz, Miriam (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)
Kycko, Marlena (University of Warsaw)
Kefauver, Shawn C. (Universitat de Barcelona, Agrotecnio Centre de Recerca en Agrotecnologia)
Van Wittenberghe, Shari (Universitat de València)
Gerhards, Max (Universität Trier)
Verrelst, Jochem (Universitat de València)
Atzberger, Clement (BOKU University)
van der Tol, Christiaan (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation – ITC)
Damm, Alexander (Universität Zürich, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)
Rascher, Uwe (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH)
Herrmann, Ittai (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Paz, Veronica Sobejano (Technical University of Denmark)
Fahrner, Sven (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH)
Pieruschka, Roland (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH)
Prikaziuk, Egor (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation – ITC)
Buchaillot, Ma Luisa (Universitat de Barcelona, Agrotecnio Centre de Recerca en Agrotecnologia)
Halabuk, Andrej (Slovak Academy of Sciences)
Celesti, Marco (ESTEC - European Space Research and Technology Centre)
Koren, Gerbrand (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development)
Gormus, Esra Tunc (Karadeniz Technical University)
Rossini, Micol (Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca)
Foerster, Michael (Technische Universität Berlin)
Siegmann, Bastian (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH)
Abdelbaki, Asmaa (Universität Trier)
Tagliabue, Giulia (Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca)
Hank, Tobias (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Darvishzadeh, Roshanak (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation – ITC)
Aasen, Helge (Agroscope, ETH Zürich)
Garcia, Monica (Centro de Estudios e Investigación para la Gestión de Riesgos Agrarios y Medioambientales)
Pôças, Isabel (ForestWISE - Collaborative Laboratory for Integrated Forest & Fire Management)
Bandopadhyay, Subhajit (University of Southampton)
Sulis, Mauro (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)
Tomelleri, Enrico (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
Rozenstein, Offer (Agricultural Research Organization of Israel)
Filchev, Lachezar (Space Research and Technology Institute)
Stancile, Gheorghe (National Meteorological Administration)
Schlerf, Martin (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology) |
|
Point of Contact
|
Use email button above to contact.
LIST RDS (LIST) |
|
Description
| Remote detection and monitoring of the vegetation responses to stress became relevant for sustainable agriculture. Ongoing developments in optical remote sensing technologies have provided tools to increase our understanding of stress-related physiological processes. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the main spectral technologies and retrieval approaches for detecting crop stress in agriculture. Firstly, we present integrated views on: i) biotic and abiotic stress factors, the phases of stress, and respective plant responses, and ii) the affected traits, appropriate spectral domains and corresponding methods for measuring traits remotely. Secondly, representative results of a systematic literature analysis are highlighted, identifying the current status and possible future trends in stress detection and monitoring. Distinct plant responses occurring under short-term, medium-term or severe chronic stress exposure can be captured with remote sensing due to specific light interaction processes, such as absorption and scattering manifested in the reflected radiance, i.e. visible (VIS), near infrared (NIR), shortwave infrared, and emitted radiance, i.e. solar-induced fluorescence and thermal infrared (TIR). From the analysis of 96 research papers, the following trends can be observed: increasing usage of satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle data in parallel with a shift in methods from simpler parametric approaches towards more advanced physically-based and hybrid models. Most study designs were largely driven by sensor availability and practical economic reasons, leading to the common usage of VIS-NIR-TIR sensor combinations. The majority of reviewed studies compared stress proxies calculated from single-source sensor domains rather than using data in a synergistic way. We identified new ways forward as guidance for improved synergistic usage of spectral domains for stress detection: (1) combined acquisition of data from multiple sensors for analysing multiple stress responses simultaneously (holistic view); (2) simultaneous retrieval of plant traits combining multi-domain radiative transfer models and machine learning methods; (3) assimilation of estimated plant traits from distinct spectral domains into integrated crop growth models. As a future outlook, we recommend combining multiple remote sensing data streams into crop model assimilation schemes to build up Digital Twins of agroecosystems, which may provide the most efficient way to detect the diversity of environmental and biotic stresses and thus enable respective management decisions. (2023-07-04)
***This entry has been automatically imported via Infodoc(ASO) CSV by LIST harvest scripts. Please refer to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113198 for the original and latest version of the dataset and data downloads*** (2025-09-02) |
|
Subject
| Earth and Environmental Sciences |
|
Keyword
| Precision agriculture multi-modal solar-induced fluorescence satellite hyperspectral multispectral biotic and abiotic stress |
|
Deposit Date
| 2023-07-04 |
|
Data Type
| Review |
|
Data Source
| Remote Sensing of Environment |