|
Persistent Identifier
|
perma:LIST.LOKEHX |
|
Publication Date
|
2026-07-06 |
|
Title
| Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies [* Cross-Reference *] |
|
Other Identifier
| https://doi.org/10.34657/9407
OpenAlex ID: https://openalex.org/W3146405570 |
|
Author
| Gunnar Luderer (Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-6155
Michaja Pehl (Leibniz Association, Technische Universität Berlin, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Technische Universität Berlin, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-6515
Anders Arvesen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1378-3142
Thomas Gibon (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Luxembourg Institute of Science and TechnologyORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-8825
Benjamin Leon Bodirsky (Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-6712
Harmen Sytze de Boer (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-2581
Oliver Fricko (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis)International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-9883
Mohamad Hejazi (Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-2208
Florian Humpenöder (Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-9407
Gokul Iyer (Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-7526
Silvana Mima (Institut polytechnique de Grenoble, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes)Institut polytechnique de Grenoble, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble, Université Grenoble AlpesORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-987X
Ioanna Mouratiadou (Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-6271
Robert Pietzcker (Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-6711
Alexander Popp (Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Leibniz Association, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-1986
Maarten van den Berg (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-7995
Detlef P. van Vuuren (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Utrecht University)Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Utrecht UniversityORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-2831
Edgar G. Hertwich (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Yale University)Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Yale UniversityORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-3421 |
|
Point of Contact
|
Use email button above to contact.
LIST QDKM (LIST) |
|
Description
| A rapid and deep decarbonization of power supply worldwide is required to limit global warming to well below 2 °C. Beyond greenhouse gas emissions, the power sector is also responsible for numerous other environmental impacts. Here we combine scenarios from integrated assessment models with a forward-looking life-cycle assessment to explore how alternative technology choices in power sector decarbonization pathways compare in terms of non-climate environmental impacts at the system level. While all decarbonization pathways yield major environmental co-benefits, we find that the scale of co-benefits as well as profiles of adverse side-effects depend strongly on technology choice. Mitigation scenarios focusing on wind and solar power are more effective in reducing human health impacts compared to those with low renewable energy, while inducing a more pronounced shift away from fossil and toward mineral resource depletion. Conversely, non-climate ecosystem damages are highly uncertain but tend to increase, chiefly due to land requirements for bioenergy. (2019-01-01)
***This entry has been automatically imported via OpenAlex by LIST harvest scripts. Please refer to https://doi.org/10.34657/9407 for the original and latest version of the publication*** (2026-07-01) |
|
Subject
| Earth and Environmental Sciences; Physics |
|
Keyword
| Renewable energy
Natural resource economics
Greenhouse gas
Life-cycle assessment
Damages
Global warming
Environmental science
Climate change
Wind power
Fossil fuel
Climate change mitigation
Environmental economics
Economics
Engineering
Waste management
Ecology
Production (economics) |
|
Topic Classification
| Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability |
|
Deposit Date
| 2019-01-01 |
|
Data Type
| Preprint |
|
Data Source
| RePEc: Research Papers in Economics |