|
Description
|
At the EU level, the Digital Product Passport has been defined across several industries, which seems to overlap with material passports. The industry is divided, and confusion persists on what a material passport is, what it contains, and how it should be issued. In this article, we try to address some of these concerns and identify the data sources, tools, and methodologies that could influence the building circularity passport. To this end, we adopt two key perspectives: (1) product/component level and (2) building level. For each perspective, we analyse existing frameworks, literature, and case studies and rank the importance of the identified tools and methodologies which have become prevalent. The ranking of data sources is done considered several data domains (e.g. composition, circularity, etc.). A discussion of the two levels is provided based on the several approaches, with limitations highlighted. (2025-04-09)
***This entry has been automatically imported via Infodoc(ASO) CSV by LIST harvest scripts. *** (2025-09-03)
|