Ecological traps and species distribution models: a challenge for prioritizing areas of conservation importance [* Cross-Reference *]

Version 1.0

Titeux, Nicolas; Aizpurua, Olatz; Hollander, Franck A.; Sardà-Palomera, Francesc; Hermoso, Virgilio; Paquet, Jean Yves; Mestdagh, Xavier; Settele, Josef; Brotons, Lluís; Van Dyck, Hans, 2020, "Ecological traps and species distribution models: a challenge for prioritizing areas of conservation importance [* Cross-Reference *]", https://lore.list.lu/citation?persistentId=perma:LIST.CGAGUZ, LIST Open Repository, V1

Learn about Data Citation Standards.

Contact Owner

Dataset Metrics

0 Downloads

Description	Species distribution models analyse how species use different types of habitats. Their spatial predictions are often used to prioritize areas for conservation. Individuals may, however, prefer settling in habitat types of low quality compared to other available habitats. This ecological trap phenomenon is usually studied in a small number of habitat patches and consequences at the landscape level are largely unknown. It is therefore often unclear whether the spatial pattern of habitat use is aligned with the behavioural decisions made by the individuals during habitat selection or reflects actual variation in the quality of different habitat types. As species distribution models analyse the pattern of occurrence in different habitats, there is a conservation interest in examining what their predictions mean in terms of habitat quality when ecological traps are operating. Previous work in Belgium showed that red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio are more attracted to newly available clear-cut habitat in plantation forests than to the traditionally used farmland habitat. We developed models with shrike distribution data and compared their predictions with spatial variation in shrike reproductive performance used as a proxy for habitat quality. Models accurately predicted shrike distribution and identified the preferred clear-cut patches as the most frequently used habitat, but reproductive performance was lower in clear-cut areas than in farmland. With human-induced rapid environmental changes, organisms may indeed be attracted to low-quality habitats and occupy them at high densities. Consequently, the predictions of statistical models based on occurrence records may not align with variation in significant population parameters for the maintenance of the species. When species expand their range to novel habitats, such models are useful to document the spatial distribution of the organisms, but data on population growth rates are worth collecting before using model predictions to guide the spatial prioritization of conservation actions. (2020-03-01) *This entry has been automatically imported via Infodoc(ASO) CSV by LIST harvest scripts. Please refer to https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04783 for the original and latest version of the dataset and data downloads* (2026-06-11)
Subject	Earth and Environmental Sciences
Keyword	behavioural maladaptation, ecological niche models, evolutionary trap, habitat preference, maladaptive habitat selection, niche-based models
License/Data Use Agreement	Custom Dataset Terms


There are no files in this dataset.

Citation Metadata

Persistent Identifier	perma:LIST.CGAGUZ
Publication Date	2026-07-06
Title	Ecological traps and species distribution models: a challenge for prioritizing areas of conservation importance [* Cross-Reference *]
Other Identifier	https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04783 SCOPUS_ID:85075732296
Author	(Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya, UCLouvain, Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig)0000-0002-7719-7417 (Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)0000-0001-6579-0064 Hollander, Franck A. (UCLouvain) (Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya)0000-0002-3121-9182 (Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya, Griffith University)0000-0003-3205-5033 (Département Études Aves-Natagora)0000-0002-2068-7976 Mestdagh, Xavier (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology) (Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig)0000-0002-8624-4983 (Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya, Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF-CERCA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas)0000-0002-4826-4457 (UCLouvain)0000-0002-2013-6824
Point of Contact	Use email button above to contact. LIST RDS (LIST)
Description	Species distribution models analyse how species use different types of habitats. Their spatial predictions are often used to prioritize areas for conservation. Individuals may, however, prefer settling in habitat types of low quality compared to other available habitats. This ecological trap phenomenon is usually studied in a small number of habitat patches and consequences at the landscape level are largely unknown. It is therefore often unclear whether the spatial pattern of habitat use is aligned with the behavioural decisions made by the individuals during habitat selection or reflects actual variation in the quality of different habitat types. As species distribution models analyse the pattern of occurrence in different habitats, there is a conservation interest in examining what their predictions mean in terms of habitat quality when ecological traps are operating. Previous work in Belgium showed that red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio are more attracted to newly available clear-cut habitat in plantation forests than to the traditionally used farmland habitat. We developed models with shrike distribution data and compared their predictions with spatial variation in shrike reproductive performance used as a proxy for habitat quality. Models accurately predicted shrike distribution and identified the preferred clear-cut patches as the most frequently used habitat, but reproductive performance was lower in clear-cut areas than in farmland. With human-induced rapid environmental changes, organisms may indeed be attracted to low-quality habitats and occupy them at high densities. Consequently, the predictions of statistical models based on occurrence records may not align with variation in significant population parameters for the maintenance of the species. When species expand their range to novel habitats, such models are useful to document the spatial distribution of the organisms, but data on population growth rates are worth collecting before using model predictions to guide the spatial prioritization of conservation actions. (2020-03-01) *This entry has been automatically imported via Infodoc(ASO) CSV by LIST harvest scripts. Please refer to https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04783 for the original and latest version of the dataset and data downloads* (2026-06-11)
Subject	Earth and Environmental Sciences
Keyword	behavioural maladaptation ecological niche models evolutionary trap habitat preference maladaptive habitat selection niche-based models
Funding Information	European Commission: 308464
Deposit Date	2020-03-01
Data Type	Article
Data Source	Ecography; ISSN: 09067590, eISSN: 16000587, vol. 43, n° 3, pp. 365-375

Dataset Terms

License/Data Use Agreement

Our Community Norms as well as good scientific practices expect that proper credit is given via citation. Please use the data citation shown on the dataset page.

Custom Dataset Terms - the following Custom Dataset Terms have been defined for this dataset.

Please refer to the original source for terms.

Dataset Version	Summary	Contributors	Published on
No records found.

Edit File

This file has already been deleted (or replaced) in the current version. It may not be edited.

Restrict Access

Restricting limits access to published files. People who want to use the restricted files can request access by default. If you disable request access, you must add information about access to the Terms of Access field.

Learn about restricting files and dataset access in the User Guide.

Request Access

Enable access request

You must enable request access or add terms of access to restrict file access.

Terms of Access for Restricted Files

Save Changes

Edit Embargo

The selected file or files have already been published. Contact an administrator to change the embargo date or reason of the file or files.

Edit Retention Period

The selected file or files have already been published. Contact an administrator to change the retention period date or reason of the file or files.

Delete Files

The file will be deleted after you click on the Delete button.

Files will not be removed from previously published versions of the dataset.

Select File(s)

Please select one or more files.

Share Dataset

Share this dataset on your favorite social media networks.

Continue

Dataset Citations

Citations for this dataset are retrieved from Crossref via DataCite using Make Data Count standards. For more information about dataset metrics, please refer to the User Guide.

Sorry, no citations were found.

Inaccessible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be downloaded because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired or the files can only be transferred via Globus.

You may request access to any restricted file(s) by clicking the Request Access button.

Ineligible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be transferred because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired or the files are not Globus accessible.

You may request access to any restricted file(s) by clicking the Request Access button.

Download Options

The files selected are too large to download as a ZIP.

You can select individual files that are below the 100.0 MB download limit from the files table, or use the Data Access API for programmatic access to the files.

Select File(s)

Please select a file or files to be downloaded.

Inaccessible Files Selected

The selected file(s) may not be downloaded because you have not been granted access or the file(s) have a retention period that has expired.

Click Continue to download the files you have access to download.

Ineligible Files Selected

Some file(s) cannot be transferred. (They are restricted, embargoed, with an expired retention period, or not Globus accessible.)

Click Continue to transfer the elligible files.

Delete Dataset

Are you sure you want to delete this dataset and all of its files? You cannot undelete this dataset.

Delete Draft Version

Are you sure you want to delete this draft version? Files will be reverted to the most recently published version. You cannot undelete this draft.

Unpublished Dataset Preview URL

Preview URL can only be used with unpublished versions of datasets.

Unpublished Dataset Preview URL

Are you sure you want to disable the Preview URL? If you have shared the Preview URL with others they will no longer be able to use it to access your unpublished dataset.

Delete Files

The file(s) will be deleted after you click on the Delete button.

Files will not be removed from previously published versions of the dataset.

Compute

This dataset contains restricted files you may not compute on because you have not been granted access.

Deaccession Dataset

Are you sure you want to deaccession? This is permanent and the selected version(s) will no longer be viewable by the public.

Deaccession Dataset

Are you sure you want to deaccession this dataset? This is permanent, and it will no longer be viewable by the public.

Version Differences Details

Please select two versions to view the differences.

Version Differences Details

Version:
Last Updated:

Select File(s)

Please select a file or files for access request.

Select File(s)

Embargoed files cannot be accessed. Please select an unembargoed file or files for your access request.

Edit Tags

Select existing file tags or create new tags to describe your files. Each file can have more than one tag.

Request Access

You need to Log In to request access.

Dataset Terms

Please confirm and/or complete the information needed below in order to request access to files in this dataset.

This dataset is made available under the following terms. Please confirm and/or complete the information needed below in order to continue.

License/Data Use Agreement

Our Community Norms as well as good scientific practices expect that proper credit is given via citation. Please use the data citation shown on the dataset page.

Custom terms specific to this dataset Custom Dataset Terms - the following Custom Dataset Terms have been defined for this dataset.

Terms of UsePlease refer to the original source for terms.

Preview Guestbook

Upon downloading files the guestbook asks for the following information.

Guestbook Name

Collected Data

Account Information

Package File Download

Use the Download URL in a Wget command or a download manager to download this package file. Download via web browser is not recommended. User Guide - Downloading a Dataverse Package via URL

Download URL

https://lore.list.lu/api/access/datafile/

Compute Batch

Clear Batch

Dataset	Persistent Identifier	Change Compute Batch

Compute Batch

Submit for Review

You will not be able to make changes to this dataset while it is in review.

Publish Dataset

Are you sure you want to republish this dataset?

Select if this is a minor or major version update.

Minor Release (1.1)

Major Release (2.0)

Publish Dataset

This dataset cannot be published until LIST Open Repository is published by its administrator.

Return to Author

Return this dataset to contributor for modification. The reason for return entered below will be sent by email to the author.

Curation Status History

Status	Date	Assigner
No records found.

Add/Edit a Version Note

Styled Citation