|
Persistent Identifier
|
perma:LIST.8GHBS8 |
|
Publication Date
|
2025-12-09 |
|
Title
| The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing [* Cross-Reference *] |
|
Other Identifier
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.016 |
|
Author
| Widlowski, Jean Luc (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Mio, Corrado (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Disney, Mathias (University College London, Natural Environment Research Council)
Adams, Jennifer (European Commission Joint Research Centre, University College London)
Andredakis, Ioannis (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Atzberger, Clement (BOKU University)
Brennan, James (University College London, Natural Environment Research Council)
Busetto, Lorenzo (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche)
Chelle, Michaël (Écologie Fonctionnelle et Écotoxicologie des Agroécosystèmes)
Ceccherini, Guido (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Colombo, Roberto (Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca)
Côté, Jean Francois (Natural Resources Canada)
Eenmäe, Alo (Eesti Maaülikool, Tartu Observatoorium)
Essery, Richard (The University of Edinburgh)
Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean Philippe (Center for Space Studies of the Biosphere)
Gobron, Nadine (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Grau, Eloi (Center for Space Studies of the Biosphere)
Haverd, Vanessa (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)
Homolová, Lucie (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic)
Huang, Huaguo (Beijing Forestry University)
Hunt, Linda (Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI))
Kobayashi, Hideki (Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)
Koetz, Benjamin (ESRIN - ESA Centre for Earth Observation)
Kuusk, Andres (Tartu Observatoorium)
Kuusk, Joel (Tartu Observatoorium)
Lang, Mait (Eesti Maaülikool, Tartu Observatoorium)
Lewis, Philip E. (University College London, Natural Environment Research Council)
Lovell, Jennifer L. (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)
Malenovský, Zbyněk (University of Wollongong)
Meroni, Michele (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Morsdorf, Felix (Universität Zürich)
Mõttus, Matti (Helsingin Yliopisto)
Ni-Meister, Wenge (Hunter College)
Pinty, Bernard (European Commission Joint Research Centre)
Rautiainen, Miina (Aalto University) - ORCID: 0000-0002-6568-3258
Schlerf, Martin (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology)
Somers, Ben (KU Leuven)
Stuckens, Jan (Merkator nv)
Verstraete, Michel M. (South African National Space Agency, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg)
Yang, Wenze (University of Maryland, College Park)
Zhao, Feng (Beihang University)
Zenone, Terenzio (Universiteit Antwerpen) |
|
Point of Contact
|
Use email button above to contact.
LIST RDS (LIST) |
|
Description
| The RAdiative transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI) activity focuses on the benchmarking of canopy radiative transfer (RT) models. For the current fourth phase of RAMI, six highly realistic virtual plant environments were constructed on the basis of intensive field data collected from (both deciduous and coniferous) forest stands as well as test sites in Europe and South Africa. Twelve RT modelling groups provided simulations of canopy scale (directional and hemispherically integrated) radiative quantities, as well as a series of binary hemispherical photographs acquired from different locations within the virtual canopies. The simulation results showed much greater variance than those recently analysed for the abstract canopy scenarios of RAMI-IV. Canopy complexity is among the most likely drivers behind operator induced errors that gave rise to the discrepancies. Conformity testing was introduced to separate the simulation results into acceptable and non-acceptable contributions. More specifically, a shared risk approach is used to evaluate the compliance of RT model simulations on the basis of reference data generated with the weighted ensemble averaging technique from ISO-13528. However, using concepts from legal metrology, the uncertainty of this reference solution will be shown to prevent a confident assessment of model performance with respect to the selected tolerance intervals. As an alternative, guarded risk decision rules will be presented to account explicitly for the uncertainty associated with the reference and candidate methods. Both guarded acceptance and guarded rejection approaches are used to make confident statements about the acceptance and/or rejection of RT model simulations with respect to the predefined tolerance intervals. (2015-01-01)
***This entry has been automatically imported via Infodoc(ASO) CSV by LIST harvest scripts. Please refer to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.016 for the original and latest version of the dataset and data downloads*** (2025-11-17) |
|
Subject
| Other |
|
Keyword
| 3D virtual plant canopy
Conformity testing
Digital hemispherical photography
GCOS
Guarded acceptance
ISO-13528
Model benchmarking
Optical remote sensing
Radiative transfer
Shared risk |
|
Deposit Date
| 2015-01-01 |
|
Data Type
| Article |